| Cheshire LACS Burns Inquiry Submission |
|
A report by the League Against Cruel Sports (Cheshire)
highlighting the hazards faced by motorists from hunting hounds.
Second Stage Evidence to the Burns Inquiry in Hunting 2000.
Background
Fox-hunting in Cheshire is believed to date
back beyond 1763. Cheshire has two fox-hunting packs,
the 'Cheshire Foxhounds' and the 'Cheshire Forest Foxhounds'.
Hunting takes place from August to October (cub-hunting)
then November to March, main season (fox-hunting).
Foxes live at the top of the food chain, their
numbers being controlled by food availability. Throughout
evolution foxes have never been chased or killed by anything,
because if they are chased they simply go down the nearest
hole to escape. Fox-hunting takes place by thwarting this
natural escape mechanism. The night before the hunt, people
go out and block up all the fox-earths, badger-setts and
drains in order to keep the fox running above ground,
causing the fox to run unnaturally long distances .The
chase is very fast initially, the pack of hounds (30 to
40) are slower but have superior stamina so that it extends
the chase. Hunting is contrived to extend the suffering
as long as possible for the benefit of the riders. When
the fox is to exhausted to continue it will be caught
and bitten to death by the pack.
Should a fox be fortunate enough to escape
to ground it will be either left, or the hunts terriermen
will take over, who then put terrier dogs into the foxes refuge,
to try and flush it out. Often the fox will not leave the
earth and both dogs fox and terrier will fight a savage underground
battle causing death or injury to one or both animals. A great
deal of digging takes place in this situation to locate the
two animals. If the fox is still alive after this ordeal it
will normally be killed by the terriermen.
Fox-hunting takes place over farm land, some
farmers who are tenant farmers for the large estates often
have no say as to whether they allow the hunt on the land
or not. Some farmers do themselves hunt and a number do not
hunt but allow the hunt on their land to reap the benefit
of having any of their fallen stock taken away free of charge
by the hunt, which is then fed to the hounds.
The League Against Cruel Sports, campaigns
legally and peacefully for legislation to protect wildlife.
It campaigns on a very simple moral question, that being,
'Is it right, particularly in this day and age that people
should derive entertainment from an activity which involves
the suffering and death of wild animals'. The RSPCA, IFAW
and numerous other animal welfare bodies oppose and lobby
against fox-hunting. Thirty seven County Councils have banned
the hunting of wild animals with hounds on their land, including
Cheshire. Twenty seven County Wildlife Trusts prohibit hunting
on their land, a clear indication that hunting is not compatible
with conservation. The Labour Party the Liberal Democrats
and a growing number of Conservative MPs are opposed to hunting.
A Labour Government has pledged to make Parliamentary time
available for a free vote on the abolition of fox-hunting,
deer hunting, and hare coursing with dogs. Tony Blair's personal
position is that he is opposed to these forms of hunting and
he would vote for their abolition, thus supporting the views
of 80% of the population who wish to see it outlawed.
Since 1994 the League Against Cruel Sports
has through it's Cheshire Support Group deployed Hunt Monitors
in Cheshire, who have recorded, collected and collated information
to expose the truth about what actually takes place at fox-hunts
to strengthen the League's argument against such activities
and expose these findings through the media. League monitors
in Cheshire do not demonstrate or protest at hunt meets, neither
do they disrupt such activities, they simply record events,
peacefully and legally, they have however been the subject
of much threat and abuse from hunt followers.
Although the hunting fraternity say their activity
takes place on (invited) private land, hunting is by nature
chaotic because hounds chase a quarry which is unpredictable
in it's direction, which can and has led them through, residential
gardens, across railway lines and main roads. This local report
aims to highlight the growing problem of hunting hounds being
out of control on public highways in Cheshire. The League
in London has also just published a report 'Track Record'
which highlights the dangers of hounds on roads and railways
nationally. (Copy enclosed). As well as putting forward proposals,
we seek to generate discussion and action to eliminate the
problem, before a member of the public is killed or injured
because of this totally avoidable hazard.
Hazard on the Highways!
Over the last two years LACS monitors have
attended numerous hunt meets in Cheshire and as well as seeing
first hand the suffering inflicted on wildlife, we have been
appalled and concerned at the number of times hounds run on
to public highways, in particular the counties busy (A) roads,
endangering not just fox and hounds but innocent road users.
Before Monitors attended hunt meets, incidents
of hounds on roads were rarely reported unless an animal was
killed such as in 1990 when a hound was struck by a vehicle
on the main A51 at Duddon and had to be destroyed.
Hounds enter on to public highways in two distinct
ways. Under control and not under control.
Hounds are assumed to be under control on public
highways when they are being escorted, usually from one hunting
area to another, by the huntsman and the whippers-in. (three
to four persons on horse back ) They supervise the pack, shepherd
them together, under control, to hopefully ensure they are
not loose in such a way that they could endanger motorists
or other road users. However even in this instance it is debatable
whether it is safe to have 30 to 40 dogs in such a fashion
on major roads.
Hounds are not under control when they are
away from the huntsman and whippers-in, during the actual
pursuit of a live quarry, who's very unpredictability in the
direction it runs, often takes itself and the pursuing hounds
across, even along public highways, endangering motorists
and other road users, sometimes with tragic consequences.
Due to this unpredictability of the direction the quarry and
hounds will run and the speed with which they travel, the
huntsman and whips are often unable to keep up with the hounds,
particularly when they are unable to take the same route,
for example, no permissible access to certain areas of land,
physical barriers, fenced areas etc. Even when they are in
close proximity of the running hounds, it is extremely difficult,
even impossible to stop a pack of forty hounds in full flight,
pursuing their quarry.
Two recent hound, road incidents, Nov 2nd 1995
Cheshire Foxhounds and Dec 24th 1995 Cheshire Forest Hunt,
(See enclosed press clips),have once again highlighted the
dangers of hounds out of control on public highways. The huntsman
and whips being only able to catch up with the hounds after
they had run across busy main roads. Sadly with tragic consequences
during one incident, with a hound being killed. It was only
by sheer good fortune that no motorists were killed or injured
during these chases.
The hunting fraternities own published hunting reports, clearly
demonstrates how hunting a wild animal in such a manner, brings
fox and hounds onto public highways and even railways. The
following are just a few extracts from numerous reports detailing
hounds on roads.
Cheshire Foxhounds Hunt reports, (Extracts)
From meets at Beeston, Nr Taporley
'Peckferton
Moss failed to hold. The next draw was Peckferton
Wood finding, going towards the main road where
he was badly headed twice by lorries, turning
left handed and running on to Peckferton Hall.'
'Taken on to Peckferton Wood, finding
and leaving the A49 on the left almost to Mr Whalley's
before turning left handed across the A49 where
he was marked to ground by the brook. A t this
point a fox was seen leaving a pit hole, hounds
quick/y taken on, hitting it off crossing the
road leaving Spurstow Lower Hall on the right,
crossing the road, swinging right-handed and crossing
Spurstow road by Spurstow Hall, making a right-handed
circle, recrossing the road by Spurstow school,
running on through Bath Wood, through Ridley Covert,
crossing the Nantwich Road (A534), crossing the
A49, running on through Ridley Bache crossing
the Chester-Whitchurch Road, running on short
of Peckferton Moss where he was marked to ground
and given best.' |
From meets at Saighton, Nr Chester
The first draw was
the nursery, taken on to Saighton Gorse which
failed to hold. Finding The Bridge Spinner, crossing
the main Chester to Whitchurch road (A41) crossing
the railway line where hounds were stopped by
an oncoming train.
Turning left handed into Platts
rough leaving here and dwelling here but going
away across the main Chester road (A41) and the
railway where a couple of hounds were killed |
|
'Hounds
hunting one out and crossing Quarry lane, left
handed round Waverton Church over Mr Salmon's
and behind Mr David's farm, crossing the road
and back over Quarry Lane swinging right-handed,
crossing the railway and over the main Chester-Whitchurch
road (A41) into Saighton Gorse, leaving here and
running parallel with the road for three fields
before turning right handed, recrossing the main road where he was lost. |
From a meet at Whitegate, Nr Northwich
| Running along the brook to
Adjuncts, crossing the main Winsford-Chester road (A54)
into Abbots Moss. This was a very fast hunt of 20mins.
Taking hounds on to Mr Whittakers kale, a good fox ran
over the Winsford Sandybrow road Hounds fairly flew up
the valley across Mr Brosters and on into Abbots Moss,
hunting hard in here for some time before pushing their
fox over the Tarporley Warrington road (A49) into Hogs
Gead |
Recommendations
The danger to motorists from hounds on roads
is very real and is not going to go away completely until
parliament legislates to outlaw such practices. It's replacement
will be draghunting, the humane alternative where hounds follow
a pre-set trail safely across the countryside. There are twenty
packs of drag-hunts already, Cheshire has two. So hunting
will not actually be given up, the tradition, the stirrup-cup,
the associated employment will all be maintained. The only
thing lost will be the kill. Although it is envisaged that
a switch to drag-hunting will greatly increase the popularity
of this Field sport, being somewhat more consumer friendly
than fox-hunting!, because it is controllable, there would
be no threat to motorists or animals and in 100 years of drag-hunting
there has never been a single recorded incident of a hunt
getting out of control and causing havoc.
in the meantime, until legislation is brought
about to abolish the hunting of wild animals with hounds,
immediate action needs to be taken to safeguard motorists.
The situation appears to be getting worse and this would appear
to be, not because the hunts are going on roads any more than
they have in the past, but because of the increased density
and speed of traffic on Cheshire's (A) roads. The problem
is being further intensified by the numbers of new fast link
roads and by-passes that have been constructed.
As a partial solution which we feel would reduce
considerably the risk to the hunted the hunters and motorists,
we propose the following.
POLICE ACTION
In 1993 we wrote to the then Chief Constable
David Graham expressing our concern at hounds on roads after
a near miss incident on the A51, requesting that he should
contact local hunts to point out the inherent dangers of their
activities near roads, with regard to road safety. Since then
nothing appears to have changed and after the incident on
November 2nd 1995, when a hound was killed on the A49 and
a disaster was narrowly averted we wrote to the present Chief
Constable Mervin Jones to highlight the dangers once again.
Assistant Chief Constable John Dwyer acting on the Chief Constable's
behalf took a very positive and sensible line on this and
held discussions with the hunts and in a letter to us dated
15th November 1995 commented "My expectations are that
a hunt comes to a halt when it approaches a main road. I can
confirm that in the course of my recent discussions with responsible
hunt members they have stated they share my expectations."
On Christmas Eve less than six weeks after
the expectations expressed in the letter, hounds from the
Cheshire Forest hunt ran out of control in pursuit of a fox
across the busy A54 at the notorious Ashton Lane end accident
black-spot. Traffic which travels at very high speeds on this
stretch of road coming down the Kelsall by-pass was brought
to a complete standstill and to say that it was fortunate
that a serious accident did not occur, would be an understatement.
(See enclosed press clip)
It is clear the expectation that hunts come
to a standstill when they reach a main road, ie the riders,
is perfectly feasible. However the expectation that the fox
and hounds come to a standstill is not and is indeed totally
unworkable, hence the Christmas Eve incident.
Therefore in a further letter to the Chief
Constable (January 1996) we asked that consideration be given
to the following proposal.
'As a solution may we suggest that hunts do
not attempt to hunt a live quarry within the close vicinity
of (A) roads (Say a 1 mile exclusion zone). In practical terms
this would mean an end to putting hounds into woods, copses,
spinneys, pit holes, or any other natural structure where
hounds could flush out and pursue a live quarry, within one
mile of an (A) road. This would have the effect of allowing
the hunts to still move along public highways in an orderly
and controlled manner from one hunting area to another, but
dramatically reduce the risk of hunted wildlife and pursuing
hounds running across these busy highways. We do not know
what powers the police have in enforcing such a suggestion,
if any, or whether it would simply be a case of the hunts
heeding police advice. But they would do well to take heed
before a member of the public is killed or injured, whilst
the existing practice continues.'
County Council Action
Section 31 (1) of the Road Traffic Act 1972
gives local authorities in England and Wales the power to
designate roads and make it an offence to permit a dog to
be on such a road without being on a lead. Designation is
often applied to main and busy roads and there should be some
form of notice on lamp-posts indicating that the road is so
designated.
There are exceptions for dogs used for a sporting
purpose under control and driving cattle or sheep
As there are exceptions for sporting dogs under
control but not out of control as is so often the
case during hunting a live quarry with hounds, we have written
(January 1996) to Cheshire County Councils Chief Road Safety
Officer John Moss to ask the following
(a) Are any roads in Cheshire currently designated
as per the above Act? If there are could you supply a list
of such roads.
(b) Who would be responsible for implementing a prosecution
under the Act.?
(c) Does Cheshire County Council have the power
to designate roads as defined in the Act, in particular the
sections of the A54 and A49 where the two most recent incidents
occurred.
Mr Moss has contacted us and expressed his
concern at the hazards faced by motorists and has passed our
questions on to the authorities legal dept.
Assuming the council has the power to designate
roads in such a manner, this would indeed be an extremely
positive and sensible course of action to reduce the hazards
posed by hunting dogs out of control on public highways.
League Against Cruel Sports (Cheshire)
|